Best apps to run Codex CLI and Claude Code together (2026)
Aiola puts Claude Code and Codex beside errors, feedback, GitHub and tasks on macOS and Windows. Compare other ways to run both.
Choosing a provider first? Read Claude Code vs Codex: choose a CLI or run both.
Why this list is short
Run Claude Code and Codex in parallel in Aiola
Use this example to split an API change and its interface work across two threads in one repository. Aiola supports exactly six CLIs: Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Grok CLI, OpenCode, and Antigravity. Bring your own configured provider access; Aiola never resells models or adds token markup.
- Open the repository as an Aiola workspace and authenticate the installed Claude Code and Codex CLIs. Start both tasks from a known base branch.
- Create a Claude Code thread for the API validation change. Choose Worktree mode for a separate checkout and branch. Local mode uses the project checkout; execution mode is a per-thread choice.
- Create a Codex thread for the form and its tests, choosing a separate worktree. Give both threads the same request/response contract and define which files each task should change.
- Open the threads side by side in split view or on the canvas. Each has its own chat and terminal; pop a thread into a native window for another monitor if useful.
- Inspect each thread’s diff and run the relevant API and interface tests. Worktrees isolate working files; they do not guarantee conflict-free integration. Reconcile the shared contract and resolve conflicts before combining branches.
- Stage and commit the reviewed changes, then open a GitHub PR from the workspace. Read the combined diff and checks before merging. You can add Cursor, Grok CLI, OpenCode, or Antigravity as another thread when the work has a clear boundary.
Explore agent threads or follow the PR review walkthrough.
The options
Aiola first because we build it; the order is not a speed test or an independent ranking.
1. Aiola
Turn product reports into agent tasks in one desktop app.
For: Developers running multiple repos who want Codex and Claude Code alongside Cursor, Grok CLI, OpenCode, and Antigravity
Pros: Runs Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Grok CLI, OpenCode, and Antigravity with your own provider access and no token markup. Errors, feedback, GitHub and analytics sit beside coding agents. A report can become a task an agent can take. Threads, persistent terminals, optional worktrees, local automations and Central help you follow work across projects. Desktop 2.0.8 supports macOS 12+ and Windows 10+ (64-bit). iPhone is on the App Store and Android on Google Play. Free download. Pro from $24/month or $240/year (100k events). GUI Lifetime $49 / $89 / $129 one-time, confirmed at checkout.
Cons: No Linux build. Hosted Analytics, App Logs, Feedback, hosted MCP and Setup Health need Pro or a trial. Disclosure: Aiola publishes this guide and this is our product.
Verdict: Choose Aiola to keep errors, feedback, analytics and GitHub beside coding agents on macOS and Windows.
Download Aiola2. Conductor
Parallel coding agents in local Mac workspaces, with paid cloud collaboration
For: Mac users whose agent setup is Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor
Pros: Its official sources list Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenCode. Free $0; paid cloud workspaces and collaboration include Pro $50/month, Teams $60/user/month, and Enterprise.
Cons: The desktop app is macOS only; Windows and Linux are unavailable. An iPhone companion is documented. OpenCode is documented; cloud routines require paid plans. Grok CLI and analytics remain unverified.
Verdict: A fit for Mac users whose agents are Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor.
Aiola vs Conductor3. Nimbalyst
Open-source visual workspace for agent sessions, document editing, and a wiki
For: Developers who need Linux or an iOS companion
Pros: Claude Code and Codex are first-class providers; OpenCode and Copilot are listed as alpha. Desktop downloads for macOS, Windows, and Linux, and a documented iOS companion. App and personal wiki $0.
Cons: Cursor Agent and Grok Build are alpha providers; recurring local agent tasks are documented. Analytics remains unverified. Try the alpha providers before relying on them.
Verdict: A fit when Linux, the iOS companion, or its visual editors matter more than six-CLI coverage.
Aiola vs Nimbalyst4. Claude Squad
Open-source terminal session manager using tmux and isolated Git workspaces
For: Terminal users who already work in tmux
Pros: Free, open-source software. Its documented workflow includes Claude Code, Codex, and other terminal agents in parallel sessions.
Cons: Terminal interface, not a desktop GUI. macOS, Linux, and Windows binaries are published; Windows needs tmux through WSL or another method. tmux and gh are prerequisites.
Verdict: A fit if you prefer tmux and want parallel sessions without a GUI.
Aiola vs Claude SquadQuick comparison
Competitor details checked against official sources on October 21, 2026.
Common questions
Build, ship and fix in one app
Errors, user feedback, GitHub and analytics live next to your coding agents in one desktop app. Every issue becomes a task an agent can take.